Monthly Archives: September 2008

Airbus Sees China as Potential Market.

EADS’ Airbus is starting an assembly plant in China, in an attempt to ‘make good’ with the central Chinese government. According to Bloomberg, “it may buy up to $1 billion of components from China by 2020, as the world’s most populous nation may need 3,000 planes in the next 20 years.” The aircraft will be produced in Tianjin city, and the company expects that the plant will produce 4 A320s a month. The new plant is a $600 million venture between Airbus and a Chinese consortium. This is made up of the Tianjin Free Trade Zone and China Aviation Industry Corp. The plant will produce A319s and A320 series aircraft, and is also considering producing A321 models, which may require $12 million in additional investments.

A few things come to mind after having read this. First, I’d like to point out that many companies create plants in China / other Asian countries for cheap labor. According to Bloomberg, Airbus is planning to make $1.46 billion (1 billion Euros), by 2012, by building plants outside of Europe. Personally, I see this as the ‘cheap way’ to improving net profit / profit margin. It reminds me of the shoe industry, specifically Nike, which has made themselves dependent on outside countries for manufacturing / production. As I’m sure many agree, building airplanes is a delicate process. A defective shoe will not kill you, but a defective airplane can. Outsourcing to countries whose workers may ‘skimp’ on detail leaves lives at stake. Please note that I’m not questioning the ability of foreign workers, rather I am questioning their compensation, which may affect their attitude toward work and attentiveness to detail. It’s also important to side-note that China has a few pending lawsuits on regulation on production. I’m curious to know how this affects the new plant / industry.

Boeing is the leader in commercial aviation sales to the Asian market. Airbus is well aware that they lack sales in that region, and sees this as an opportunity to secure sales in China and surrounding countries. In his book “Boeing versus Airbus”, John Newhouse states that Boeing opened the door for Airbus when it first came out with the A32X series aircraft in European markets. Airbus gained vital relationships with airlines, and now is the largest manufacturer of aircraft in the world. As for the Asian market, I feel as though Boeing has a good grip and a good sense of its customer base, and what their needs are. It’ll be very tough for Airbus to ‘capture’ the Asian market like Boeing does / has. 

I’m interested to see how this new plant plays out for Airbus. I am very concerned about the quality of products that come out of China. Regulations on labor and production may allow for plants to skimp on manufacturing. As I’m sure we all agree, skimping on aircraft production is dangerous. If the Chinese have stricter regulations specifically for the aircraft manufacturing industry, then it may work out. However, I think that this is the wrong industry to outsource. 

Image: flickr.com

Air Traffic Control: Are Trainees a Safety Issue?

A Mesa Airlines Bombardier CRJ-700, flying under the name United Express, experienced a near collision with a Cessna 172 on a runway in Allentown, Pennsylvania. The Cessna had just landed and missed its exit point onto a taxiway. Before it had missed its exit point, the Mesa CRJ was cleared for takeoff on the same runway. While on the takeoff roll, the Mesa crew saw the Cessna on the runway, and rejected their takeoff at 120 knots. The CRJ swerved around the Cessna, missing the aircraft by approximately 10 feet. This incident occurred on Monday. The air traffic controller handling this issue was a trainee. About 35% of the Air Traffic Controllers in Allentown Tower are trainees. 

The Air Traffic Control system is in a struggle to keep enough staff on hand. They are in a serious crisis, as they are now in a time period when current Air Traffic Controllers are eligible for retirement. According to Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 85 percent of U.S. air traffic controllers (14,000) will be eligible for retirement over the next decade. Needless to say, this leaves a serious gap to fill.

For those of you that may have forgotten, or simply were not alive at the time, the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization was the main labor union for the United States’ air traffic controllers. However in 1981, the union declared a strike, asking for better pay and a 32-hour work week. (Not bad, eh?) The union violated a law, 5 U.S.C. (Supp. III 1956) 118p., that bans strikes by government unions. Other unions, such as the postal workers, went on strike without facing penalty. President Ronald Reagan ordered the air traffic controllers back to work, citing public safety as a primary concern. They were given 48 hours to return. As a result, Reagan fired the 11,345 striking air traffic controllers who had ignored the order. Secretly trained air traffic controllers replaced those striking air traffic controllers. Some of them never returned; others did in 1996. 

As a result of Reagan firing many air traffic controllers, the replacements were generally the same age. Present day, we lack air traffic controllers. It’s been reported that the FAA has lowered the standards / rigor of tests for air traffic control hopefuls. Some airport towers have the same trainee ratio as Allentown. Although the NTSB is still conducting an accident investigation, I think it’s fair to say that there was not enough staffing. 

As a pilot, I trust air traffic controllers to guide me through the air safely and efficiently. I am very confident that the trainees and new air traffic controllers are excellent at what they do. The recent event at Allentown has put a spotlight (the economy steals most of it) on air traffic control trainees. Yet, I think it is more important that we focus on the staffing, or amount of people, at an air traffic control facility, rather than the level / age of the air traffic controller. 

Image: flickr.com

Airlines in the U.S. to Ground Over 500 Aircraft.

The Middle Seat Terminal reports that JP Morgan counted the number of aircraft that U.S. airlines will be grounding this year. The total is… (drum-roll), 512 aircraft. These aircraft will be sent oversees to Russia, third world countries, or left to bask in the sun of the Mojave / Arizona deserts. In total, that’s about 10-12% of the U.S. capacity that is being grounded. It’s no doubt that the price of oil has played a role in this. Do not forget that many airlines are replacing old aircraft with new aircraft. A prime example of that is Continental Airlines, who is replacing most of it’s again 737-300 / 500 fleet with 737NGs (737-7/8/900ERs). New aircraft tend to be more fuel efficient and have a greater range.  I think that we can expect to see more aircraft grounded as time goes on. 

Here is the breakdown (from JP Morgan / The Middle Seat Terminal):

Continental: 67 mainline jets (737-300s and 737-500s); 64 regional jets
Delta: 15-20 mainline jets; 100 regional jets
United: 100 mainline jets (94 737s and six 747s)
American: 40 mainline jets (30 MD80s, 10 A300s);37 regional jets and 26 turboprops
Northwest: 47 mainline jets (14 757s/A320s and 33 DC-9s)
US Airways: 12 mainline jets
JetBlue: four regional jets

Image: flickr.com

FAA Approves Eclipse 500 Despite Significant Design Flaws.

The Federal Aviation Administration approved Eclipse Aviation’s Eclipse 500, a very light jet, despite some significant design flaws, and overruled voiced concerns from government engineers, test pilots and inspectors. The Transportation Department Inspector General Calvin Scovel said that Federal Aviation Administration officials quickly certified the Eclipse 500 very light jet for flight, although there were “unresolved design problems.” Problems were also found in the production process with Eclipse Aviation. 

It has been suggested that a cozy relationship between the manufacturer and the FAA have caused this problem. The committee of investigators said that the FAA scrutinizes established manufacturers more-so than new manufacturers. It has been suggested that the FAA’s aircraft approval system be reviewed.

Today, 250 jets are currently in service. The recently bankrupt DayJet, based in Boca Raton, FL, had 239 orders for the aircraft, and was expected to place 70 more. The aircraft seats 5 to 10 people, and flies up to 425 miles per hour.  

Over 80 service complaints, from operators of the aircraft, have been filed against Eclipse Aviation. Flaws were found. On June 5, a throttle failed while on approach to Chicago-Midway airport. The throttle was stuck at maximum power. The pilots were able to make an emergency landing with the aircraft. The event caused the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the FAA to issue a safety directive relating to the throttle failure. 

I’ve had the chance to see this aircraft at my home airport. I’ve also seen on approach at Boca-Raton Executive Airport. Initially, I thought it was a neat-looking concept jet. However, just because a plane is neat looking, doesn’t mean it is safe. The FAA’s decision to approve this jet reeks havoc in my mind. It appears as though the FAA has opened the door up for ‘schmoozing.’ And, needless to say, it seems a bit reckless and risky to have lower standards for new manufacturers. It is my hope that this issue is corrected. 

There are two sides to every issue. This has drawn attention to the FAA and their tolerance and respect of safety for the general public. It is, after-all, the FAA’s first and foremost duty to ensure public safety in the air. 

Image: flickr.com